Skip to content


Skolnick Vs. Kerner - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number387 U.S. 91
AppellantSkolnick
RespondentKerner
Excerpt:
skolnick v. kerner - 387 u.s. 91 (1967) u.s. supreme court skolnick v. kerner, 387 u.s. 91 (1967) 387 u.s. 91 skolnick v. kerner, governor of illinois, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 1401, misc. decided may 15, 1967. 260 f. supp. 318, appeal dismissed. appellant pro se. william g. clark, attorney general of illinois, and richard a. michael, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 387 u.s. 91, 92
Judgment:
SKOLNICK v. KERNER - 387 U.S. 91 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SKOLNICK v. KERNER, 387 U.S. 91 (1967) 387 U.S. 91

SKOLNICK v. KERNER, GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1401, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1967.

260 F. Supp. 318, appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 387 U.S. 91, 92




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //