Skip to content


Banks Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number387 U.S. 92
AppellantBanks
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....v. california, 387 u.s. 92 (1967) 387 u.s. 92 banks v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of california, first appellate district. no. 889, misc. decided may 15, 1967. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. petitioner pro se. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, albert w. harris, jr., assistant attorney general, and charles w. rumph, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court of appeal of california, first appellate district, for further consideration in light of chapman v. california, 386 u.s......
Judgment:
BANKS v. CALIFORNIA - 387 U.S. 92 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court BANKS v. CALIFORNIA, 387 U.S. 92 (1967) 387 U.S. 92

BANKS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 889, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 .

Page 387 U.S. 92, 93




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //