Skip to content


Armored Carrier Corp. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 778
AppellantArmored Carrier Corp.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
armored carrier corp. v. united states - 386 u.s. 778 (1967) u.s. supreme court armored carrier corp. v. united states, 386 u.s. 778 (1967) 386 u.s. 778 armored carrier corp. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of new york. no. 1011. decided may 8, 1967. 260 f. supp. 612, affirmed. j. kevin murphy for appellant. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and nahum litt for the united states et al., and seymour d. lewis for b. d.c. corp., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment:
ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES - 386 U.S. 778 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967) 386 U.S. 778

ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1011.
Decided May 8, 1967.

260 F. Supp. 612, affirmed.

J. Kevin Murphy for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Seymour D. Lewis for B. D.C. Corp., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //