Skip to content


Prohibition Party of Michigan Vs. Hare - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 713
AppellantProhibition Party of Michigan
RespondentHare
Excerpt:
prohibition party of michigan v. hare - 386 u.s. 713 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports prohibition party of michigan v. hare, 386 u.s. 713 (1967) prohibition party of michigan v. hare, 386 u.s. 713 (1967) 386 u.s. 713 prohibition party of michigan et al. v. hare, secretary of state of michigan, et al. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 1098. decided april 24, 1967. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. james l. elsman, jr., for appellants. frank j. kelley, attorney general of michigan, robert a. derengoski, solicitor general, and russell a. searl, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers.....
Judgment:
PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE - 386 U.S. 713 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE, 386 U.S. 713 (1967) PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN v. HARE, 386 U.S. 713 (1967) 386 U.S. 713

PROHIBITION PARTY OF MICHIGAN ET AL. v. HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF
MICHIGAN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 1098.
Decided April 24, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James L. Elsman, Jr., for appellants.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Russell A. Searl, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //