Skip to content


Bostick Vs. South Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 479
AppellantBostick
RespondentSouth Carolina
Excerpt:
bostick v. south carolina - 386 u.s. 479 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports bostick v. south carolina, 386 u.s. 479 (1967) bostick v. south carolina, 386 u.s. 479 (1967) 386 u.s. 479 bostick v. south carolina et al. certiorari to the supreme court of south carolina. no. 647. argued march 20, 1967 decided march 27, 1967. 247 s. c. 22, 145 s. e. 2d 439, reversed. matthew j. perry argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the brief was charles e. washington, jr. everett n. brandon, assistant attorney general of south carolina, argued the cause for respondents. with him on the brief were daniel r. mcleod, attorney general, and randolph murdaugh. per curiam. the judgment of the supreme court of south carolina is reversed......
Judgment:
BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA - 386 U.S. 479 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 386 U.S. 479 (1967) BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 386 U.S. 479 (1967) 386 U.S. 479

BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 647.
Argued March 20, 1967
Decided March 27, 1967.

247 S. C. 22, 145 S. E. 2d 439, reversed.

Matthew J. Perry argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Charles E. Washington, Jr.

Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, and Randolph Murdaugh.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is reversed. Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (1967).

Page 386 U.S. 479, 480




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //