Skip to content


Rogers Vs. City and County of Denver - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 480
AppellantRogers
RespondentCity and County of Denver
Excerpt:
rogers v. city and county of denver - 386 u.s. 480 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports rogers v. city and county of denver, 386 u.s. 480 (1967) rogers v. city and county of denver, 386 u.s. 480 (1967) 386 u.s. 480 rogers et al. v. city and county of denver et al. appeal from the supreme court of colorado. no. 998. decided march 27, 1967. ___ colo. ___, 419 p.2d 648, appeal dismissed. harry l. arkin for appellants. max p. zall, charles s. rhyne, brice w. rhyne and alfred j. tighe, jr., for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 386 u.s. 480, 481
Judgment:
ROGERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER - 386 U.S. 480 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports ROGERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 386 U.S. 480 (1967) ROGERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 386 U.S. 480 (1967) 386 U.S. 480

ROGERS ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 998.
Decided March 27, 1967.

___ Colo. ___, 419 P.2d 648, appeal dismissed.

Harry L. Arkin for appellants.

Max P. Zall, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 386 U.S. 480, 481




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //