Skip to content


Connor Vs. Johnson - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 483
AppellantConnor
RespondentJohnson
Excerpt:
.....no. 999. decided march 27, 1967. 265 f. supp. 492, î affirmed. [ footnote î ] errata: " 265 f. supp. 492" should be " 279 f. supp. 619" . carl rachlin, marvin m. karpatkin, arthur kinoy, melvin l. wulf, alvin j. bronstein and robert b. mckay for appellants. joe t. patterson, attorney general of mississippi, and martin r. mclendon, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument. page 386 u.s. 483, 484
Judgment:
CONNOR v. JOHNSON - 386 U.S. 483 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports CONNOR v. JOHNSON, 386 U.S. 483 (1967) CONNOR v. JOHNSON, 386 U.S. 483 (1967) 386 U.S. 483

CONNOR ET AL. v. JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
MISSISSIPPI. No. 999.
Decided March 27, 1967.

265 F. Supp. 492, î affirmed.

[ Footnote î ] ERRATA: " 265 F. Supp. 492" should be " 279 F. Supp. 619" .

Carl Rachlin, Marvin M. Karpatkin, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, Alvin J. Bronstein and Robert B. McKay for appellants.

Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Martin R. McLendon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Page 386 U.S. 483, 484




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //