Skip to content


Arden Farms Co. Vs. State Department of Agriculture - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 350
AppellantArden Farms Co.
RespondentState Department of Agriculture
Excerpt:
arden farms co. v. state department of agriculture - 386 u.s. 350 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports arden farms co. v. state department of agriculture, 386 u.s. 350 (1967) arden farms co. v. state department of agriculture, 386 u.s. 350 (1967) 386 u.s. 350 arden farms co. et al. v. state department of agriculture et al. appeal from the supreme court of oregon. no. 1004. decided march 20, 1967. 245 ore. -, 420 p.2d 379, appeal dismissed. james c. dezendorf for appellants. robert y. thornton, attorney general of oregon, and harold e. burke and don parker, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr......
Judgment:
ARDEN FARMS CO. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - 386 U.S. 350 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports ARDEN FARMS CO. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 386 U.S. 350 (1967) ARDEN FARMS CO. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 386 U.S. 350 (1967) 386 U.S. 350

ARDEN FARMS CO. ET AL. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 1004.
Decided March 20, 1967.

245 Ore. -, 420 P.2d 379, appeal dismissed.

James C. Dezendorf for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 386 U.S. 350, 351




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //