Skip to content


Hudgins Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 265
AppellantHudgins
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
hudgins v. california - 386 u.s. 265 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports hudgins v. california, 386 u.s. 265 (1967) hudgins v. california, 386 u.s. 265 (1967) 386 u.s. 265 hudgins v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 37, misc. decided march 13, 1967. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of chapman v. california, ante, p. 18. mr. justice stewart is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied because the petition was not timely filed. page 386 u.s. 265, 266
Judgment:
HUDGINS v. CALIFORNIA - 386 U.S. 265 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports HUDGINS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 265 (1967) HUDGINS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 265 (1967) 386 U.S. 265

HUDGINS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 37, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied because the petition was not timely filed.

Page 386 U.S. 265, 266




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //