Skip to content


Wackenhut Corp. Vs. Aponte - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 268
AppellantWackenhut Corp.
RespondentAponte
Excerpt:
wackenhut corp. v. aponte - 386 u.s. 268 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports wackenhut corp. v. aponte, 386 u.s. 268 (1967) wackenhut corp. v. aponte, 386 u.s. 268 (1967) 386 u.s. 268 wackenhut corp. et al. v. aponte, superintendent of police, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of puerto rico. no. 726. decided march 13, 1967. affirmed. donald m. hall for wackenhut corp. et al., and william b. graves for marvil international security services, inc., appellants. j. b. fernandez badillo, solicitor general of puerto rico, and peter ortiz, assistant solicitor general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 386 u.s. 268, 269
Judgment:
WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE - 386 U.S. 268 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, 386 U.S. 268 (1967) WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, 386 U.S. 268 (1967) 386 U.S. 268

WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL. v. APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
PUERTO RICO. No. 726.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Affirmed.

Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants.

J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 268, 269




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //