Skip to content


KAYE Vs. CO-ORDiN. COMM., DiSC., ASS'N, CiTY, N. YORK - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 17
AppellantKAYE
RespondentCO-ORDiN. COMM., DiSC., ASS'N, CiTY, N. YORK
Excerpt:
kaye v. co-ordin. comm., disc., ass'n, city, n. york - 386 u.s. 17 (1967) u.s. supreme court reports kaye v. co-ordin. comm., disc., ass'n, city, n. york, 386 u.s. 17 (1967) kaye v. co-ordin. comm., disc., ass'n, city, n. york, 386 u.s. 17 (1967) 386 u.s. 17 kaye v. co-ordinating committee on discipline of the association of the bar of the city of new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate division of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department. no. 300. decided february 13, 1967. certiorari granted; 24 app. div. 2d 345, 266 n. y. s. 2d 69, vacated and remanded. morton liftin for petitioner. angelo t. cometa for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. the.....
Judgment:
KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK - 386 U.S. 17 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) 386 U.S. 17

KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR
OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 300.
Decided February 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 24 App. Div. 2d 345, 266 N. Y. S. 2d 69, vacated and remanded.

Morton Liftin for petitioner.

Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 500 .

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530.

Page 386 U.S. 17, 18




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //