Skip to content


Sprowal Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 649
AppellantSprowal
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 825. decided january 23, 1967. appeal dismissed. carl rachlin for appellant. frank s. hogan for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 385 u.s. 649, 650 fein v. new york, 385 u.s. 649 (1967) 385 u.s. 649 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court fein v. new york, 385 u.s. 649 (1967) 385 u.s. 649 fein v. new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 793. decided january 23, 1967. 18 n. y. 2d 162, 219 n. e. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. .....
Judgment:
SPROWAL v. NEW YORK - 385 U.S. 649 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SPROWAL v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967) 385 U.S. 649

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 825.
Decided January 23, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.

Carl Rachlin for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 385 U.S. 649, 650


FEIN v. NEW YORK, <a href="/101788"> 385 U.S. 649 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 649 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court FEIN v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967) 385 U.S. 649

FEIN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 793.
Decided January 23, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 162, 219 N. E. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Louis Nizer, Paul Martinson and Bennett Boskey for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //