Skip to content


Short Vs. Ness Produce Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 537
AppellantShort
RespondentNess Produce Co.
Excerpt:
short v. ness produce co. - 385 u.s. 537 (1967) u.s. supreme court short v. ness produce co., 385 u.s. 537 (1967) 385 u.s. 537 short et al. v. ness produce co. appeal from the united states district court for the district of oregon. no. 779. decided january 16, 1967. 263 f. supp. 586, affirmed. robert y. thornton, attorney general of oregon, and harold e. burke and don parker, assistant attorneys general, for appellants. j. bradley colburn and theodore b. jensen for appellee. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black and mr. justice harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. page 385 u.s. 537, 538
Judgment:
SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO. - 385 U.S. 537 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO., 385 U.S. 537 (1967) 385 U.S. 537

SHORT ET AL. v. NESS PRODUCE CO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 779.
Decided January 16, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 586, affirmed.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

J. Bradley Colburn and Theodore B. Jensen for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 385 U.S. 537, 538




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //