Skip to content


Nehring Vs. City of Dekalb - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 453
AppellantNehring
RespondentCity of Dekalb
Excerpt:
.....al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 758. decided january 9, 1967. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 385 u.s. 453, 454 roosevelt raceway v. county of nassau, 385 u.s. 453 (1967) 385 u.s. 453 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court roosevelt raceway v. county of nassau, 385 u.s. 453 (1967) 385 u.s. 453 roosevelt raceway, inc. v. county of nassau et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 732. decided january 9, 1967. 18 n. y. 2d 30, 218 n. e. 2d 539, appeal dismissed. george morton levy.....
Judgment:
NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB - 385 U.S. 453 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB, 385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453

NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 758.
Decided January 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 453, 454


ROOSEVELT RACEWAY v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, <a href="/101806"> 385 U.S. 453 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 453 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court ROOSEVELT RACEWAY v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, 385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453

ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. COUNTY OF NASSAU ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 732.
Decided January 9, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 30, 218 N. E. 2d 539, appeal dismissed.

George Morton Levy for appellant.

Morris H. Schneider for the County of Nassau et al.; Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //