Skip to content


Duddleston Vs. Grills - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 455
AppellantDuddleston
RespondentGrills
Excerpt:
.....v. sanders, 376 u.s. 1 , and reynolds v. sims, 377 u.s. 533 . mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. page 385 u.s. 455, 456 .....
Judgment:
DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS - 385 U.S. 455 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967) 385 U.S. 455

DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.

255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded.

Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 , and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

Page 385 U.S. 455, 456




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //