Skip to content


Michael Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number386 U.S. 283
AppellantMichael
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in chapman v. california, ante, at 42. page 386 u.s. 283, 284 .....
Judgment:
MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA - 386 U.S. 283 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 283 (1967) MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 283 (1967) 386 U.S. 283

MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 465, Misc. Filed March 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert P. Samoian, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Page 386 U.S. 283, 284




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //