Skip to content


HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRiERS' BUREAU Vs. UNiTED STATES - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 265
AppellantHOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRiERS' BUREAU
RespondentUNiTED STATES
Excerpt:
household goods carriers' bureau v. united states - 393 u.s. 265 (1968) u.s. supreme court household goods carriers' bureau v. united states, 393 u.s. 265 (1968) 393 u.s. 265 household goods carriers' bureau et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of california. no. 615. decided december 16, 1968. 288 f. supp. 641, affirmed. homer s. carpenter for appellants. alan f. wohlstetter for household goods forwarders association of america, inc., et al., intervening defendants below. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general zimmerman, robert w. ginnane, and betty jo christian for the united states et al. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the.....
Judgment:
HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU v. UNITED STATES - 393 U.S. 265 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 265 (1968) 393 U.S. 265

HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 615.
Decided December 16, 1968.

288 F. Supp. 641, affirmed.

Homer S. Carpenter for appellants.

Alan F. Wohlstetter for Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, Inc., et al., intervening defendants below.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Robert W. Ginnane, and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


OGLE v. HEIM, <a href="/101846"> 393 U.S. 265 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 265 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court OGLE v. HEIM, 393 U.S. 265 (1968) 393 U.S. 265

OGLE v. HEIM, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OF COUNTY OF ORANGE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 617.
Decided December 16, 1968.

69 Cal. 2d 7, 442 P.2d 659, appeal dismissed.

Eric A. Rose for appellant.

Robert F. Nuttman for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 265, 266




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //