Skip to content


Wilson Vs. Kelley - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 266
AppellantWilson
RespondentKelley
Excerpt:
.....393 u.s. 266 wilson et al. v. kelley, corrections director, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of georgia. no. 561. decided december 16, 1968. affirmed. charles morgan, jr., reber f. boult, jr., howard moore, jr., p. walter jones, arthur kinoy, melvin l. wulf, and martin garbus for appellants. arthur k. bolton, attorney general of georgia, harold n. hill, jr., executive assistant attorney general, marion o. gordon, mathew robins, and w. wheeler bryan, assistant attorneys general, and don l. hartman, deputy assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice douglas and mr. justice white are of the opinion that probable.....
Judgment:
WILSON v. KELLEY - 393 U.S. 266 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WILSON v. KELLEY, 393 U.S. 266 (1968) 393 U.S. 266

WILSON ET AL. v. KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 561.
Decided December 16, 1968.

Affirmed.

Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., P. Walter Jones, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, and Martin Garbus for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Mathew Robins, and W. Wheeler Bryan, Assistant Attorneys General, and Don L. Hartman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 266, 267




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //