Skip to content


Standard Oil Co. of California Vs. City of Los Angeles - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 267
AppellantStandard Oil Co. of California
RespondentCity of Los Angeles
Excerpt:
standard oil co. of california v. city of los angeles - 393 u.s. 267 (1968) u.s. supreme court standard oil co. of california v. city of los angeles, 393 u.s. 267 (1968) 393 u.s. 267 standard oil co. of california v. city of los angeles et al. appeal from the court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 609. decided december 16, 1968. 262 cal. app. 2d 118, 68 cal. rptr. 512, appeal dismissed. francis r. kirkham, francis n. marshall, and marcus mattson for appellant. roger arnebergh, gilmore tillman, henry e. kappler, and ellis j. horvitz for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.' page 393 u.s. 267, 268
Judgment:
STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES - 393 U.S. 267 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 393 U.S. 267 (1968) 393 U.S. 267

STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 609.
Decided December 16, 1968.

262 Cal. App. 2d 118, 68 Cal. Rptr. 512, appeal dismissed.

Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Horvitz for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.'

Page 393 U.S. 267, 268




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //