Skip to content


Stiles Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 219
AppellantStiles
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
stiles v. united states - 393 u.s. 219 (1968) u.s. supreme court stiles v. united states, 393 u.s. 219 (1968) 393 u.s. 219 stiles v. united states. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the first circuit. no. 74. argued november 20, 1968. decided december 9, 1968. certiorari dismissed. charles j. rogers, jr., by appointment of the court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. solicitor general griswold argued the cause for the united states. with him on the brief were assistant attorney general vinson, jerome m. feit, and lawrence p. cohen. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 393 u.s. 219, 220
Judgment:
STILES v. UNITED STATES - 393 U.S. 219 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court STILES v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 219 (1968) 393 U.S. 219

STILES v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
No. 74.
Argued November 20, 1968.
Decided December 9, 1968.

Certiorari dismissed.

Charles J. Rogers, Jr., by appointment of the Court, post, p. 813, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Lawrence P. Cohen.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 393 U.S. 219, 220




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //