Skip to content


Atlantic Ocean Products Inc. Vs. Leth - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 127
AppellantAtlantic Ocean Products Inc.
RespondentLeth
Excerpt:
..... 292 f. supp. 615, affirmed. thomas h. tongue for appellants. robert y. thornton, attorney general of oregon, and harold e. burke, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. doolin v. korshak, 393 u.s. 127 (1968) 393 u.s. 127 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court doolin v. korshak, 393 u.s. 127 (1968) 393 u.s. 127 doolin, dba national novelty co., et al. v. korshak, director of revenue, et al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 439. decided november 12, 1968. 39 ill. 2d 521, 236 n. e. 2d 897, appeal dismissed. owen rall for appellants. william g. clark, attorney general of illinois, and john j. o'toole, assistant.....
Judgment:
ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH - 393 U.S. 127 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH, 393 U.S. 127 (1968) 393 U.S. 127

ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. v.
LETH, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OF OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 417.
Decided November 12, 1968.

292 F. Supp. 615, affirmed.

Thomas H. Tongue for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, <a href="/101869"> 393 U.S. 127 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 127 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, 393 U.S. 127 (1968) 393 U.S. 127

DOOLIN, DBA NATIONAL NOVELTY CO., ET AL.
v. KORSHAK, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 439.
Decided November 12, 1968.

39 Ill. 2d 521, 236 N. E. 2d 897, appeal dismissed.

Owen Rall for appellants.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 127, 128




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //