Skip to content


Overton Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 85
AppellantOverton
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....term of the supreme court of new york is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of bumper v. north carolina, 391 u.s. 543 (1968). mr. justice black dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction here. page 393 u.s. 85, 86 .....
Judgment:
OVERTON v. NEW YORK - 393 U.S. 85 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court OVERTON v. NEW YORK, 393 U.S. 85 (1968) 393 U.S. 85

OVERTON v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 212.
Decided October 28, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Melvin L. Wulf and David C. Gilberg for petitioner.

Carl A. Vergari and James J. Duggan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents and would affirm the judgment of conviction here.

Page 393 U.S. 85, 86




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //