Skip to content


Bounds, Warden Vs. Crawford - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 76
AppellantBounds, Warden
RespondentCrawford
Excerpt:
bounds, warden v. crawford - 393 u.s. 76 (1968) u.s. supreme court bounds, warden v. crawford, 393 u.s. 76 (1968) 393 u.s. 76 bounds, warden v. crawford. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit. no. 279. decided october 21, 1968. certiorari granted; 395 f.2d 297 , vacated and remanded. thomas wade bruton, attorney general of north carolina, and andrew a. vanore, jr., for petitioner. per curiam. the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of witherspoon v. illinois, 391 u.s. 510 ,.....
Judgment:
BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD - 393 U.S. 76 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

BOUNDS, WARDEN v. CRAWFORD.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 279.
Decided October 21, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 395 F.2d 297 , vacated and remanded.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , and for consideration of the other constitutional questions raised in the case.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


IN RE HAGOPIAN, <a href="/101877"> 393 U.S. 76 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 76 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court IN RE HAGOPIAN, 393 U.S. 76 (1968) 393 U.S. 76

IN RE HAGOPIAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 352.
Decided October 21, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file an amended jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 393 U.S. 76, 77




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //