Skip to content


Hanover Insurance Co. Vs. Victor - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 7
AppellantHanover Insurance Co.
RespondentVictor
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 50. decided october 14, 1968. appeal dismissed. florindo m. derosa, duncan c. lee, frank a. celentano, and peter j. malloy, jr., for appellant. harriet e. gair for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. cohon v. kirby, 393 u.s. 7 (1968) 393 u.s. 7 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court cohon v. kirby, 393 u.s. 7 (1968) 393 u.s. 7 cohon et al. v. kirby, director, department of alcoholic beverage control of california. appeal from the court of appeal of california, first appellate district. no. 57. decided october 14, 1968. 256 cal. app. 2d 158, 64 cal. rptr. 26,.....
Judgment:
HANOVER INSURANCE CO. v. VICTOR - 393 U.S. 7 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court HANOVER INSURANCE CO. v. VICTOR, 393 U.S. 7 (1968) 393 U.S. 7

HANOVER INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK v. VICTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 50.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

Florindo M. DeRosa, Duncan C. Lee, Frank A. Celentano, and Peter J. Malloy, Jr., for appellant.

Harriet E. Gair for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


COHON v. KIRBY, <a href="/101884"> 393 U.S. 7 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 7 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court COHON v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 7 (1968) 393 U.S. 7

COHON ET AL. v.
KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 57.
Decided October 14, 1968.

256 Cal. App. 2d 158, 64 Cal. Rptr. 26, appeal dismissed.

Herbert A. Leland, March E. Leland, J. Bruce Fratis, Joseph L. Alioto, and Richard Saveri for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer and L. Stephen Porter, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 7, 8




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //