Skip to content


Louisiana Educ. Comm. for Needy Children Vs. Poindexter - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 17
AppellantLouisiana Educ. Comm. for Needy Children
RespondentPoindexter
Excerpt:
.....h. perez and luke a. petrovich for appellants. solicitor general griswold and assistant attorney general pollak for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. westside liquor co. v. kirby, 393 u.s. 17 (1968) 393 u.s. 17 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court westside liquor co. v. kirby, 393 u.s. 17 (1968) 393 u.s. 17 westside liquor co. v. kirby, director, department of alcoholic beverage control of california. appeal from the court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 324. decided october 14, 1968. 259 cal. app. 2d 511, 66 cal. rptr. 434, appeal dismissed. harold easton for appellant. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and lynn.....
Judgment:
LOUISIANA EDUC. COMM. FOR NEEDY CHILDREN v. POINDEXTER - 393 U.S. 17 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court LOUISIANA EDUC. COMM. FOR NEEDY CHILDREN v. POINDEXTER, 393 U.S. 17 (1968) 393 U.S. 17

LOUISIANA EDUCATION COMMISSION FOR NEEDY CHILDREN ET AL.
v. POINDEXTER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 284.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Affirmed.

Leander H. Perez and Luke A. Petrovich for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY, <a href="/101894"> 393 U.S. 17 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 17 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 17 (1968) 393 U.S. 17

WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY, DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 324.
Decided October 14, 1968.

259 Cal. App. 2d 511, 66 Cal. Rptr. 434, appeal dismissed.

Harold Easton for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Lynn Henry Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 17, 18




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //