Skip to content


Pennwick Corp. Vs. Kirby - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 19
AppellantPennwick Corp.
RespondentKirby
Excerpt:
..... appeal dismissed. jacques leslie and lawrence teplin for appellant. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and lynn henry johnson, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. tyrrell v. crouse, 393 u.s. 19 (1968) 393 u.s. 19 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court tyrrell v. crouse, 393 u.s. 19 (1968) 393 u.s. 19 tyrrell v. crouse, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 59, misc. decided october 14, 1968. certiorari granted; judgment reversed. robert c. londerholm, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth and.....
Judgment:
PENNWICK CORP. v. KIRBY - 393 U.S. 19 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court PENNWICK CORP. v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 19 (1968) 393 U.S. 19

PENNWICK CORP. v. KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 325.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

Jacques Leslie and Lawrence Teplin for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Lynn Henry Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


TYRRELL v. CROUSE, <a href="/101896"> 393 U.S. 19 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 19 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court TYRRELL v. CROUSE, 393 U.S. 19 (1968) 393 U.S. 19

TYRRELL v. CROUSE, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 59, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1968.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Jon K. Sargent, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. In accordance with the concession by the respondent the judgment is reversed. Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54 .

Page 393 U.S. 19, 20




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //