Skip to content


Chan Kwan Chung Vs. Immigration and Nat. Serv. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number392 U.S. 642
AppellantChan Kwan Chung
Respondentimmigration and Nat. Serv.
Excerpt:
.....chan kwan chung v. immigration and nat. serv. - 392 u.s. 642 (1968) u.s. supreme court chan kwan chung v. immigration and nat. serv., 392 u.s. 642 (1968) 392 u.s. 642 chan kwan chung v. immigration and naturalization service. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit. no. 637. decided june 17, 1968. 381 f.2d 542 , affirmed. abraham lebenkoff for petitioner. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general vinson, beatrice rosenberg, and julia p. cooper for respondent. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. city of williamsport v. united states, 392 u.s. 642 (1968) 392 u.s. 642 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court city of williamsport v. united states, 392.....
Judgment:
CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV. - 392 U.S. 642 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV., 392 U.S. 642 (1968) 392 U.S. 642

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD
CIRCUIT. No. 637.
Decided June 17, 1968.

381 F.2d 542 , affirmed.

Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Julia P. Cooper for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.


CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101915"> 392 U.S. 642 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 642 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 642 (1968) 392 U.S. 642

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1401.
Decided June 17, 1968.

282 F. Supp. 46, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall and Harvey Gelb for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., and Carl Helmetag, Jr., for Penn Central Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 392 U.S. 642, 643




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //