Skip to content


Goldman Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number392 U.S. 643
AppellantGoldman
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....of new york. no. 1261. decided june 17, 1968. 21 n. y. 2d 152, 234 n. e. 2d 194, appeal dismissed. robert e. goldman and stephen r. wiener for appellant. frank s. hogan and h. richard uviller for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. rhodes v. cook, 392 u.s. 643 (1968) 392 u.s. 643 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court rhodes v. cook, 392 u.s. 643 (1968) 392 u.s. 643 rhodes v. cook. appeal from the supreme court of washington. no. 1283. decided june 17, 1968. 72 wash. 2d 436, 433 p.2d 677, appeal dismissed. .....
Judgment:
GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK - 392 U.S. 643 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968) 392 U.S. 643

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1261.
Decided June 17, 1968.

21 N. Y. 2d 152, 234 N. E. 2d 194, appeal dismissed.

Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.


RHODES v. COOK, <a href="/101916"> 392 U.S. 643 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 643 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968) 392 U.S. 643

RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.

E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.

John F. Wilson for appellee.

Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 392 U.S. 643, 644




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //