Skip to content


Sullivan Vs. Little Hunting Park, Inc. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number392 U.S. 657
AppellantSullivan
RespondentLittle Hunting Park, Inc.
Excerpt:
sullivan v. little hunting park, inc. - 392 u.s. 657 (1968) u.s. supreme court sullivan v. little hunting park, inc., 392 u.s. 657 (1968) 392 u.s. 657 sullivan et al. v. little hunting park, inc., et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 1188. decided june 17, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. allison w. brown, jr., robert m. alexander, jack greenberg, and james m. nabrit iii for petitioners. john chas. harris for respondents. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. the case is remanded to the supreme court of appeals of virginia for further consideration in light of jones v. alfred h. mayer co., ante, p. 409. .....
Judgment:
SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC. - 392 U.S. 657 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SULLIVAN v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., 392 U.S. 657 (1968) 392 U.S. 657

SULLIVAN ET AL. v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 1188.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg, and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners.

John Chas. Harris for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 409.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., ante, p. 449.

Page 392 U.S. 657, 658




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //