Skip to content


Clark Walter and Sons, Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number392 U.S. 659
AppellantClark Walter and Sons, Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
.....clark walter & sons, inc. v. united states - 392 u.s. 659 (1968) u.s. supreme court clark walter & sons, inc. v. united states, 392 u.s. 659 (1968) 392 u.s. 659 clark walter & sons, inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of new jersey. no. 1404. decided june 17, 1968. affirmed. howard t. rosen and william j. o'shaughnessy for appellant. solicitor general griswold, acting assistant attorney general zimmerman, and howard e. shapiro for the united states, and donald b. kipp and james c. pitney for western electric co. et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black and mr. justice fortas are of the.....
Judgment:
CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 392 U.S. 659 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968) 392 U.S. 659

CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Affirmed.

Howard T. Rosen and William J. O'Shaughnessy for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 392 U.S. 659, 660




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //