Skip to content


Johnson Products, Inc. Vs. City Council of Medford - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number392 U.S. 296
AppellantJohnson Products, Inc.
RespondentCity Council of Medford
Excerpt:
.....for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. perla v. new york, 392 u.s. 296 (1968) 392 u.s. 296 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court perla v. new york, 392 u.s. 296 (1968) 392 u.s. 296 perla v. new york et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of new york. no. 1407. decided june 10, 1968. certiorari granted; 21 n. y. 2d 608, 237 n. e. 2d 215, reversed. herald price fahringer and eugene gressman for petitioner. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, pro se, ruth kessler toch, solicitor general, and julius l. sackman, assistant attorney general, for respondents. per curiam. the.....
Judgment:
JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD - 392 U.S. 296 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD, 392 U.S. 296 (1968) 392 U.S. 296

JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 1398.
Decided June 10, 1968.

353 Mass. 540, 233 N. E. 2d 316, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

David Berman for appellant.

Arthur V. Getchell for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PERLA v. NEW YORK, <a href="/101953"> 392 U.S. 296 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 296 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court PERLA v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 296 (1968) 392 U.S. 296

PERLA v. NEW YORK ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1407.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 608, 237 N. E. 2d 215, reversed.

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273.

Page 392 U.S. 296, 297




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //