Skip to content


Jackson Vs. Oliver - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number391 U.S. 602
AppellantJackson
RespondentOliver
Excerpt:
..... 391 u.s. 602 jackson v. oliver, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 547, misc. decided june 3, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and edsel w. haws and edward a. hinz, jr., deputy attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit for further consideration in light of peyton v. rowe, ante, p. 54. heyman v. michigan, 391 u.s. 602 (1968) 391 u.s. 602 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court .....
Judgment:
JACKSON v. OLIVER - 391 U.S. 602 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court JACKSON v. OLIVER, 391 U.S. 602 (1968) 391 U.S. 602

JACKSON v. OLIVER, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 547, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, ante, p. 54.


HEYMAN v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/101977"> 391 U.S. 602 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 602 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court HEYMAN v. MICHIGAN, 391 U.S. 602 (1968) 391 U.S. 602

HEYMAN v. MICHIGAN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 1099, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, ante, p. 54.

Page 391 U.S. 602, 603




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //