Skip to content


Vaughn Vs. Rodriguez - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number391 U.S. 603
AppellantVaughn
RespondentRodriguez
Excerpt:
.....u.s. 603 (1968) 391 u.s. 603 vaughn v. rodriguez, acting warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 1149, misc. decided june 3, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. boston e. witt, attorney general of new mexico, and thomas o. olson, special assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit for further consideration in light of peyton v. rowe, ante, p. 54. peart v. california, 391 u.s. 603 (1968) 391 u.s. 603 (1968) "> u.s......
Judgment:
VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ - 391 U.S. 603 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ, 391 U.S. 603 (1968) 391 U.S. 603

VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ, ACTING WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1149, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Boston E. Witt, Attorney General of New Mexico, and Thomas O. Olson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, ante, p. 54.


PEART v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/101978"> 391 U.S. 603 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 603 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court PEART v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 603 (1968) 391 U.S. 603

PEART v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1445, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

67 Cal. 2d 866, 434 P.2d 609, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 391 U.S. 603, 604




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //