Skip to content


Rabeck Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number391 U.S. 462
AppellantRabeck
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
rabeck v. new york - 391 u.s. 462 (1968) u.s. supreme court rabeck v. new york, 391 u.s. 462 (1968) rabeck v. new york no. 611 decided may 27, 1968 391 u.s. 462 appeal from the appellate term of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department syllabus former § 484-i of the new york penal law, which prohibited the sale of "magazines . . . which would appeal to the lust of persons under the age of eighteen years or to their curiosity as to sex or to the anatomical differences between the sexes," is unconstitutionally vague, and it is no answer to say that it was adopted for the salutary purpose of protecting children. reversed. per curiam. appellant, in seeking reversal of his conviction for selling.....
Judgment:
Rabeck v. New York - 391 U.S. 462 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court Rabeck v. New York, 391 U.S. 462 (1968)

Rabeck v. New York

No. 611

Decided May 27, 1968

391 U.S. 462

APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT

OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Syllabus

Former § 484-i of the New York Penal Law, which prohibited the sale of "magazines . . . which would appeal to the lust of persons under the age of eighteen years or to their curiosity as to sex or to the anatomical differences between the sexes," is unconstitutionally vague, and it is no answer to say that it was adopted for the salutary purpose of protecting children.

Reversed.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, in seeking reversal of his conviction for selling "girlie" magazines to a minor under 18 years of age in violation of former § 484-i, New York Penal Law, * argues, among other grounds, that the statute is impermissibly vague. We agree. While we rejected a like claim as to § 484-h in Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629 , § 484-i in part prohibited the sale of

"any . . . magazines . . . which would appeal to the lust of persons under the age of eighteen years or to their curiosity as to sex or to the anatomical differences between the sexes. . . ."

That standard, in our view, is unconstitutionally vague.

"Nor is it an answer to an argument that a particular regulation of expression is vague to say that it was adopted for the salutary purpose of protecting children. The permissible extent of vagueness is

Page 391 U. S. 463

not directly proportional to, or a function of, the extent of the power to regulate or control expression with respect to children."

Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 390 U. S. 676 , 390 U. S. 689 .

Reversed.

MR JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs, would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629 , 390 U. S. 650 .

MR JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 390 U. S. 676 , 390 U. S. 704 . In addition, he considers it a particularly fruitless judicial act to strike down on the score of vagueness a state statute which has already been repealed.

* Section 484-i was repealed by N.Y.Laws 1967, c. 791. See Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629 , 390 U. S. 631 -632, n. 1.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //