Skip to content


Ross Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number391 U.S. 470
AppellantRoss
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
ross v. california - 391 u.s. 470 (1968) u.s. supreme court ross v. california, 391 u.s. 470 (1968) 391 u.s. 470 ross v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 798, misc. decided may 27, 1968. certiorari granted; 67 cal. 2d 64, 429 p.2d 606, reversed. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and walter r. jones, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. chapman v. california, 386 u.s. 18 , and anderson v. nelson, 390 u.s. 523 . mr. justice black is of the opinion that.....
Judgment:
ROSS v. CALIFORNIA - 391 U.S. 470 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 470 (1968) 391 U.S. 470

ROSS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 798, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 67 Cal. 2d 64, 429 P.2d 606, reversed.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 391 U.S. 470, 471




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //