Skip to content


Seferi Vs. Ives - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number391 U.S. 359
AppellantSeferi
Respondentives
Excerpt:
.....dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. north american van lines, inc. v. united states, 391 u.s. 359 (1968) 391 u.s. 359 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court north american van lines, inc. v. united states, 391 u.s. 359 (1968) 391 u.s. 359 north american van lines, inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of indiana. no. 1295. decided may 20, 1968. 277 f. supp. 741, affirmed. martin a. weissert for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general turner, robert w. ginnane, and betty jo christian for the united states et al., and alan f. wohlstetter for smyth overseas van lines, inc., et al., appellees. per curiam. the.....
Judgment:
SEFERI v. IVES - 391 U.S. 359 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SEFERI v. IVES, 391 U.S. 359 (1968) 391 U.S. 359

SEFERI ET AL. v. IVES, STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 1241.
Decided May 20, 1968.

155 Conn. 580, 236 A. 2d 83, appeal dismissed.

Albert L. Coles for appellants.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Jack Rubin and Clement J. Kichuk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/102012"> 391 U.S. 359 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 359 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 391 U.S. 359 (1968) 391 U.S. 359

NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 1295.
Decided May 20, 1968.

277 F. Supp. 741, affirmed.

Martin A. Weissert for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane, and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Alan F. Wohlstetter for Smyth Overseas Van Lines, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 391 U.S. 359, 360




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //