Skip to content


California Vs. Phillips Petroleum Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number391 U.S. 365
AppellantCalifornia
RespondentPhillips Petroleum Co.
Excerpt:
california v. phillips petroleum co. - 391 u.s. 365 (1968) u.s. supreme court california v. phillips petroleum co., 391 u.s. 365 (1968) 391 u.s. 365 california et al. v. phillips petroleum co. et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 373. decided may 20, 1968. * certiorari granted; 377 f.2d 278 , vacated and remanded. [ footnote * ] together with no. 380, pacific gas & electric co. et al. v. phillips petroleum co. et al., and no. 385, federal power commission v. phillips petroleum co. et al., also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court. mary moran pajalich and j. calvin simpson for petitioners in no. 373. frederick t. searls and malcolm h......
Judgment:
CALIFORNIA v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. - 391 U.S. 365 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court CALIFORNIA v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO., 391 U.S. 365 (1968) 391 U.S. 365

CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 373.
Decided May 20, 1968. *

Certiorari granted; 377 F.2d 278 , vacated and remanded.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 380, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., and No. 385, Federal Power Commission v. Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court.

Mary Moran Pajalich and J. Calvin Simpson for petitioners in No. 373. Frederick T. Searls and Malcolm H. Furbush for Pacific Gas & Electric Co., C. Hayden Ames for San Diego Gas & Electric Co., and John Ormasa for Southern California Gas Co. et al., petitioners in No. 380. Solicitor General Marshall and Richard A. Solomon for petitioner in No. 385.

Tom P. Hamill, R. D. Haworth, James L. Armour, William H. Tabb, and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent Mobil Oil Corp. in all three cases.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are vacated. The cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Permian Basin Area Rate Cases, 390 U.S. 747 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 391 U.S. 365, 366




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //