Skip to content


Scafati Vs. Greenfield - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 713
AppellantScafati
RespondentGreenfield
Excerpt:
scafati v. greenfield - 390 u.s. 713 (1968) u.s. supreme court scafati v. greenfield, 390 u.s. 713 (1968) 390 u.s. 713 scafati, correctional superintendent v. greenfield. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts. no. 1104. decided april 22, 1968. 277 f. supp. 644, affirmed. elliot l. richardson, attorney general of massachusetts, willie j. davis and howard m. miller, assistant attorneys general, and richard l. levine, deputy assistant attorney general, for appellant. per curiam. the motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white would note probable jurisdiction and.....
Judgment:
SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD - 390 U.S. 713 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

SCAFATI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT v. GREENFIELD.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1104.
Decided April 22, 1968.

277 F. Supp. 644, affirmed.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Willie J. Davis and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorneys General, and Richard L. Levine, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.


TILL v. NEW MEXICO, <a href="/102036"> 390 U.S. 713 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 713 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court TILL v. NEW MEXICO, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

TILL v. NEW MEXICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 1189, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1968.

78 N. M. 255, 430 P.2d 752, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Gladys Towles Root for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 713, 714




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //