Skip to content


BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. Vs. MASTERS - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 597
AppellantBERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC.
RespondentMASTERS
Excerpt:
.....court of pennsylvania. no. 1132. decided april 8, 1968. 428 pa. 20, 236 a. 2d 197, appeal dismissed. hubert i. teitelbaum and martin m. sheinman for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. inc. village, p. jefferson v. bd. of supers., suffolk, 390 u.s. 597 (1968) 390 u.s. 597 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court inc. village, p. jefferson v. bd. of supers., suffolk, 390 u.s. 597 (1968) 390 u.s. 597 incorporated village of port jefferson et al. v. board of supervisors of the county of suffolk et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 1152. decided april 8, 1968. appeal dismissed. william m. johnson for appellants. stanley s......
Judgment:
BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS - 390 U.S. 597 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, 390 U.S. 597 (1968) 390 U.S. 597

BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 1132.
Decided April 8, 1968.

428 Pa. 20, 236 A. 2d 197, appeal dismissed.

Hubert I. Teitelbaum and Martin M. Sheinman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


INC. VILLAGE, P. JEFFERSON v. BD. OF SUPERS., SUFFOLK, <a href="/102048"> 390 U.S. 597 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 597 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court INC. VILLAGE, P. JEFFERSON v. BD. OF SUPERS., SUFFOLK, 390 U.S. 597 (1968) 390 U.S. 597

INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON ET AL. v. BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 1152.
Decided April 8, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

William M. Johnson for appellants.

Stanley S. Corwin for Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al., and Frederick Mars for Receiver of Taxes of the Town of Brookhaven, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 390 U.S. 597, 598




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //