Skip to content


Reed Enterprises Vs. Clark - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 457
AppellantReed Enterprises
RespondentClark
Excerpt:
reed enterprises v. clark - 390 u.s. 457 (1968) u.s. supreme court reed enterprises v. clark, 390 u.s. 457 (1968) 390 u.s. 457 reed enterprises et al. v. clark, attorney general, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 1092. decided march 25, 1968. 278 f. supp. 372, affirmed. stanley fleishman, david rein and sam rosenwein for appellants. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general vinson and philip r. monahan for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. mr. justice marshall took no.....
Judgment:
REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK - 390 U.S. 457 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.

278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/102062"> 390 U.S. 457 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 457 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 390 U.S. 457, 458




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //