Skip to content


Lookretis Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 338
AppellantLookretis
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
lookretis v. united states - 390 u.s. 338 (1968) u.s. supreme court lookretis v. united states, 390 u.s. 338 (1968) 390 u.s. 338 lookretis v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. no. 913. decided march 11, 1968. certiorari granted; 385 f.2d 487 , vacated and remanded. maurice j. walsh for petitioner. solicitor general griswold for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of chapman v. california, 386 u.s. 18 , and marchetti v. united states, ante, p. 39. mr. justice white is of the opinion that the petition for.....
Judgment:
LOOKRETIS v. UNITED STATES - 390 U.S. 338 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court LOOKRETIS v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 338 (1968) 390 U.S. 338

LOOKRETIS v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 913.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 487 , vacated and remanded.

Maurice J. Walsh for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , and Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.


HETTLEMAN v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE, <a href="/102076"> 390 U.S. 338 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 338 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court HETTLEMAN v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE, 390 U.S. 338 (1968) 390 U.S. 338

HETTLEMAN ET AL. v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 961.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Julius L. Sherwin for appellants.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, Edward J. Hladis and Ronald Butler for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 338, 339




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //