Skip to content


Justice Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 199
AppellantJustice
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
justice v. united states - 390 u.s. 199 (1968) u.s. supreme court justice v. united states, 390 u.s. 199 (1968) 390 u.s. 199 justice et ux. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of kentucky. no. 570. decided march 4, 1968. 274 f. supp. 283, affirmed. francis d. burke for appellants. acting solicitor general spritzer, assistant attorney general rogovin and joseph m. howard for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. jones v. russell, 390 u.s. 199 (1968) 390 u.s. 199 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court jones v. russell, 390 u.s. 199 (1968) 390 u.s. 199 jones v. russell,.....
Judgment:
JUSTICE v. UNITED STATES - 390 U.S. 199 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court JUSTICE v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 199 (1968) 390 U.S. 199

JUSTICE ET UX. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF KENTUCKY. No. 570.
Decided March 4, 1968.

274 F. Supp. 283, affirmed.

Francis D. Burke for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Joseph M. Howard for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


JONES v. RUSSELL, <a href="/102092"> 390 U.S. 199 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 199 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court JONES v. RUSSELL, 390 U.S. 199 (1968) 390 U.S. 199

JONES v. RUSSELL, WARDEN
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
No. 407, Misc.
Decided March 4, 1968

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the representations of the Attorney General and our own independent consideration of the entire case, the judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for further proceedings.

Page 390 U.S. 199, 200




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //