Skip to content


Smith Vs. Noble Drilling Corp. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 143
AppellantSmith
RespondentNoble Drilling Corp.
Excerpt:
smith v. noble drilling corp. - 390 u.s. 143 (1968) u.s. supreme court smith v. noble drilling corp., 390 u.s. 143 (1968) 390 u.s. 143 smith v. noble drilling corp. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of louisiana. no. 648. decided january 29, 1968. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. samuel c. gainsburgh for petitioner. w. ford reese for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari to the supreme court of louisiana is granted. the judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of louisiana for further consideration in light of billiot v. sewart seacraft, inc., 382 f.2d 662 (c. a. 5th cir. 1967), and loffland brothers co. v. huckabee, 373 f.2d 528 .....
Judgment:
SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP. - 390 U.S. 143 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968) 390 U.S. 143

SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 648.
Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner.

W. Ford Reese for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967).

Page 390 U.S. 143, 144




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //