Skip to content


Garafolo Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 144
AppellantGarafolo
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
garafolo v. united states - 390 u.s. 144 (1968) u.s. supreme court garafolo v. united states, 390 u.s. 144 (1968) 390 u.s. 144 garafolo v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. no. 866. decided january 29, 1968. certiorari granted; 385 f.2d 200 , vacated and remanded. francis heisler for petitioner. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general vinson and beatrice rosenberg for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit is vacated. the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of smith v. illinois,.....
Judgment:
GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES - 390 U.S. 144 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 144 (1968) 390 U.S. 144

GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 866.
Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 200 , vacated and remanded.

Francis Heisler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, ante, p. 129.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 144, 145




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //