Skip to content


Knight Vs. Board of Regents of the Univ., State, New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 36
AppellantKnight
RespondentBoard of Regents of the Univ., State, New York
Excerpt:
knight v. board of regents of the univ., state, new york - 390 u.s. 36 (1968) u.s. supreme court knight v. board of regents of the univ., state, new york, 390 u.s. 36 (1968) 390 u.s. 36 knight et al. v. board of regents of the university of the state of new york et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 826. decided january 22, 1968. 269 f. supp. 339, affirmed. alan h. levine and jeremiah s. gutman for appellants. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and charles a. la torella, jr., and maria l. marcus, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is.....
Judgment:
KNIGHT v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIV., STATE, NEW YORK - 390 U.S. 36 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court KNIGHT v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIV., STATE, NEW YORK, 390 U.S. 36 (1968) 390 U.S. 36

KNIGHT ET AL. v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 826.
Decided January 22, 1968.

269 F. Supp. 339, affirmed.

Alan H. Levine and Jeremiah S. Gutman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS, <a href="/102110"> 390 U.S. 36 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 36 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS, 390 U.S. 36 (1968) 390 U.S. 36

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 815.
Decided January 22, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 36, 37




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //