Skip to content


Wetter Vs. City of Indianapolis - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number390 U.S. 37
AppellantWetter
RespondentCity of Indianapolis
Excerpt:
.....court of indiana. no. 895. decided january 22, 1968. ___ ind. ___, 226 n. e. 2d 886, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. edward h. knight and richard m. givan for appellants. harry t. ice for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. bogart v. state bar of california, 390 u.s. 37 (1968) 390 u.s. 37 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court bogart v. state bar of california, 390 u.s. 37 (1968) 390 u.s. 37 bogart v. state bar of california et al. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 806, misc. decided january 22, 1968. .....
Judgment:
WETTER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS - 390 U.S. 37 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court WETTER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, 390 U.S. 37 (1968) 390 U.S. 37

WETTER ET AL. v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 895.
Decided January 22, 1968.

___ Ind. ___, 226 N. E. 2d 886, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Edward H. Knight and Richard M. Givan for appellants.

Harry T. Ice for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


BOGART v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, <a href="/102111"> 390 U.S. 37 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 37 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOGART v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, 390 U.S. 37 (1968) 390 U.S. 37

BOGART v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 806, Misc.
Decided January 22, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Peter D. Bogart, appellant, pro se.

Homer I. Mitchell and F. La Mar Forshee for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 37, 38




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //