Skip to content


Strickland Transportation Co., Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 574
AppellantStrickland Transportation Co., Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
strickland transportation co., inc. v. united states - 389 u.s. 574 (1968) u.s. supreme court strickland transportation co., inc. v. united states, 389 u.s. 574 (1968) 389 u.s. 574 strickland transportation co., inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of texas. no. 839. decided january 15, 1968. 274 f. supp. 921, affirmed. ralph w. currie and ewell h. muse, jr., for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general turner, robert w. ginnane and nahum litt for the united states et al., and phillip robinson for appellees central freight lines, inc., et al. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. kirk v. gong, .....
Judgment:
STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES - 389 U.S. 574 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 574 (1968) 389 U.S. 574

STRICKLAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 839.
Decided January 15, 1968.

274 F. Supp. 921, affirmed.

Ralph W. Currie and Ewell H. Muse, Jr., for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Phillip Robinson for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


KIRK v. GONG, <a href="/102126"> 389 U.S. 574 </a> (1968) 389 U.S. 574 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court KIRK v. GONG, 389 U.S. 574 (1968) 389 U.S. 574

KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL. v. GONG ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF FLORIDA. No. 872.
Decided January 15, 1968.

278 F. Supp. 133, affirmed.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Thomas C. Britton, Stuart Simon, D. P. S. Paul and P. D. Thomson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 574, 575




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //