Skip to content


Robert-arthur Management Corp. Vs. Tenn. Ex Rel. Canale - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 578
AppellantRobert-arthur Management Corp.
RespondentTenn. Ex Rel. Canale
Excerpt:
robert-arthur management corp. v. tenn. ex rel. canale - 389 u.s. 578 (1968) u.s. supreme court robert-arthur management corp. v. tenn. ex rel. canale, 389 u.s. 578 (1968) 389 u.s. 578 robert-arthur management corp. v. tennessee ex rel. canale, district attorney general. appeal from the supreme court of tennessee. no. 679. decided january 15, 1968. ___ tenn. ___, 414 s. w. 2d 638, reversed. longstreet heiskell for appellant. george f. mccanless, attorney general of tennessee, and thomas e. fox, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the judgment of the supreme court of tennessee is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . the chief justice would affirm. mr. justice harlan would affirm for the.....
Judgment:
ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENN. EX REL. CANALE - 389 U.S. 578 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENN. EX REL. CANALE, 389 U.S. 578 (1968) 389 U.S. 578

ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE EX REL. CANALE, DISTRICT
ATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE. No. 679.
Decided January 15, 1968.

___ Tenn. ___, 414 S. W. 2d 638, reversed.

Longstreet Heiskell for appellant.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE would affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 .

Page 389 U.S. 578, 579




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //