Skip to content


Osbourne Vs. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 579
AppellantOsbourne
RespondentMississippi Valley Barge Line Co.
Excerpt:
osbourne v. mississippi valley barge line co. - 389 u.s. 579 (1968) u.s. supreme court osbourne v. mississippi valley barge line co., 389 u.s. 579 (1968) 389 u.s. 579 osbourne et al. v. mississippi valley barge line co. et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of missouri. no. 768. decided january 15, 1968. 273 f. supp. 1, affirmed. john l. laubach, jr., for appellants osbourne et al. arthur l. winn, jr., samuel h. moerman, j. raymond clark and james m. henderson for mississippi valley barge line co. et al., and solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general turner, robert w. ginnane and fritz r. kahn for the united states et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are.....
Judgment:
OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. - 389 U.S. 579 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968) 389 U.S. 579

OSBOURNE ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF MISSOURI. No. 768.
Decided January 15, 1968.

273 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne et al.

Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. et al., and Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.

Page 389 U.S. 579, 580




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //