Skip to content


Ambrose Vs. Wells - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 112
AppellantAmbrose
RespondentWells
Excerpt:
.....court for the southern district of new york no. 580. decided december 8, 1969 appeal dismissed. john m. armentano for appellants. robert b. mckay for wells, and louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, pro se, and george d. zuckerman, assistant attorney general, for rockefeller et al., appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. gooding v. wilson, 396 u.s. 112 (1969) 396 u.s. 112 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court gooding v. wilson, 396 u.s. 112 (1969) 396 u.s. 112 gooding, warden v. wilson appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of georgia no. 582. decided december 8, 1969 303 f. supp......
Judgment:
AMBROSE v. WELLS - 396 U.S. 112 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court AMBROSE v. WELLS, 396 U.S. 112 (1969) 396 U.S. 112

AMBROSE ET AL. v. WELLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 580.
Decided December 8, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

John M. Armentano for appellants.

Robert B. McKay for Wells, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, for Rockefeller et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


GOODING v. WILSON, <a href="/102229"> 396 U.S. 112 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 112 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court GOODING v. WILSON, 396 U.S. 112 (1969) 396 U.S. 112

GOODING, WARDEN v. WILSON
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA No. 582.
Decided December 8, 1969

303 F. Supp. 952, appeal dismissed.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon and Courtney Wilder Stanton, Assistant Attorneys General, and Franklin Pierce for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 396 U.S. 112, 113




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //